500
Alan Nicolea's picture

Do you like this article? Share it with your friends.

thebigtip award: up to $200 for best article – Read more

The little master gets better with age

By Alan Nicolea on Wed, 13/10.2010

The rivalry between India and Australia has often produced fiery, if not spiteful encounters between two of Cricket’s traditional superpowers. Such a contest however seems to bring out the best from both teams and during the 1991-1992 tour down under, a little known Indian by the name of Sachin Tendulkar blossomed in the summer heat, making two centuries in Sydney and Perth respectively.


Tendulkar’s performance in Australia 19 years ago led the great Merv Hughes to proclaim that ‘the little master’ would go on and amass more runs than legendary aussie team-mate Allan Border.


Fast forward to 2010 and Tendulkar has long since become a Cricketing icon, conjuring more runs and centuries than any other batsman in history in both forms of the game.


And at 37 years of age, Tendulkar is still changing the record books, with his latest performance against Australia in the second test now something to saviour.


Tendulkar's 49th Test century in combination with Murali Vijay's first has seen India dominate a Test match which earlier had an Australian victory firmly on the cards.


A record third-wicket stand of 308 runs however has seen India wrestle back momentum, thanks largely to Tendulkar’s devine intervention.


Tendulkar was faultless as he rattled along towards three figures.


Having dealt successfully with the nervous-nineties on 48 previous occasions, the world's leading run-scorer, on 99, reached his 49th Test hundred in convincing fashion with a commanding six over long-on to set the excited Bangalore crowd into a frenzy.


It was a fitting way for the multiple record-holder to go to three figures and provide a solid reminder as to why Tendulkar, at 37, won the 2010 ICC’s player of the year award - the highest individual honour in Cricket.


And as a player of Tendulkar’s calibre should, ‘the little master’ eventually went on to post his sixth double ton to leave India in a commanding position with just one day remaining.


Despite being nearly in his forties, Tendulkar is in career best form, amassing more than 1100 runs this calendar year, which currently includes six centures.


Only his remarkable 2002 season, where he amassed 1392 runs, betters Tendulkar’s efforts this year.


It seems like ‘the little master’ is getting better with age, and with the Cricket World Cup just around the corner, Tendulkar will be desperate to win the trophy which has eluded him throughout his illustrious career.


No doubt if Tendulkar is crowned a world champion next year, ‘the little master’ will have ticked all the boxes necessary to ensure his status as the greatest batsman ever.

 
Unable to follow this user

Join to follow

Alan Nicolea's picture

Alan Nicolea

I attained my Journalism Diploma in 2009 and I am completing my Bachelor of Arts Degree majoring in media and cultural...

Leave a comment

anonymous user's picture

"No doubt if Tendulkar is

"No doubt if Tendulkar is crowned a world champion next year, ‘the little master’ will have ticked all the boxes necessary to ensure his status as the greatest batsman ever."

Are you kidding me? Longevity for any good batsman will always amount to the type of records Tendulkar is amassing - most runs, most centuries etc. It does NOT make him the greatest batsman ever. I could name at least five players better than Tendulkar, not least THE greatest of them all in Bradman. Statistically there is absolutely no comparison between the two, The Don is leagues ahead of Tendulkar. Suggesting Tendulkar is a greater batsman is a huge insult and displays an incredible lack of knowledge of the game.

admin's picture

I don't know about a lack of

I don't know about a lack of knowledge buddy. This is my opinion and I doubt Bradman would be able to muster 99 runs every innings if he faced the calibre of bowlers Tendulkar has faced throughout his career.

Rick18's picture

I thought there'd be more

I thought there'd be more analysis then one throw away sentence at the end, which is a little disappointing (and why I clicked on bad call, to be honest). There's so much you can compare between the two:

- Uncovered pitches & Bodyline compared to featherbeds for the majority of home tests
- The consistency from Tendulkar which probably was (is?) better than Bradman's career, as he suffered from a few more form slumps
- Different range of countries to face for Tendulkar, where Bradman was mainly England, which can be taken as a positive for either person

And so much more...

anonymous user's picture

Admin, it's a bit silly

Admin, it's a bit silly making assumptions like that. Bradman wouldn't of done this or that is based purely on your opinion with very little factual basis. You could just as easily say the same about Sachin and today's other great players benefiting from a host of advantageous conditions - bigger bats, smaller boundaries, covered pitches etc. I also disagree with your statement that the bowlers Sachin faced were better than Bradman. I'd love to see Sachin face bodyline bowling and still fare as well. No chance.
Suggesting Tendulkar is the greatest of all time is also an insult to the likes of Garfield Sobers, IVA Richards, Graeme Pollock, Hobbs etc who were all at least as good as him. Sobers in fact was a better batsman, not to mention is great bowling!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly. If you have a Gravatar account, used to display your avatar.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Close